TrendNew Politics. Diplomacy. Markets. Tech. What matters.
Diplomacy 6 min read

The Cracks Are Showing—And Not Where You'd Expect

A King's speech divides Washington, North Korea's suicide soldiers confirm the worst, and the UAE just nuked OPEC. The global order is fragmenting in real time.

The Cracks Are Showing—And Not Where You'd Expect

There’s a moment in every empire’s decline when you stop asking “what’s wrong?” and start asking “what’s holding this together at all?”

We hit that moment last week. Not with a bang. With a king giving a speech that somehow managed to embarrass both parties at once, a former FBI director facing charges over a meme, North Korean soldiers being ordered to blow themselves up rather than surrender, and the UAE basically telling OPEC to get bent.

These aren’t isolated incidents. They’re symptoms of the same disease: the institutions and alliances that have structured the last 80 years of global politics are losing their grip on reality.

The UAE Just Broke OPEC’s Spine

Let’s start with the most underrated story of the month. The United Arab Emirates announced it’s leaving OPEC—and nobody’s talking about how much this matters.

For decades, OPEC worked because a handful of countries controlling oil supplies could coordinate pricing and production. It was crude cartelling, literally. But the UAE had been complaining for years that OPEC’s quotas unfairly limited its exports. At some point you stop complaining and you leave.

Detailed close-up of a cracked concrete wall texture, perfect for backgrounds and design elements. Photo by cottonbro studio / Pexels

The timing tells you everything. This isn’t happening during a peaceful period. It’s happening while Iran and its proxies are actively destabilizing the region, while the Strait of Hormuz—through which roughly a third of the world’s seaborne oil moves—is under constant threat. That’s when you’d expect producers to stick together. Instead, the UAE is walking.

My read: The UAE has decided that staying in OPEC costs more than leaving. Maybe that’s about the quotas. More likely, it’s about the UAE’s increasingly strained relationship with Saudi Arabia and its calculation that Saudi Arabia’s influence over OPEC no longer serves its interests. The story says the UAE’s departure “is expected to weaken OPEC’s influence.” That’s diplomatic language for “OPEC is dying.”

The oil market won’t crater tomorrow. But this is how cartels fracture—not with a single defection, but with the first domino that makes others wonder if they should be next. The assumption that major producers will coordinate on price has been the bedrock of energy markets since the 1970s. That assumption just got wobbly.

A King, A Congress, and A Very Uncomfortable Moment

In Washington, a king gave a speech to Congress that apparently landed different with Democrats than it did with the White House. The headline is vague on purpose—whoever wrote it wanted us curious. But here’s what we can read between the lines: the speech contained lines that Democrats found encouraging, while simultaneously raising eyebrows with the administration that invited him.

That’s not a small thing. A visiting dignitary doesn’t usually find himself in the position of being more aligned with the opposition party than with the White House that’s hosting him. It suggests either (a) the administration is so fractured it can’t coordinate its diplomatic messaging, or (b) the foreign leader deliberately played both sides.

Given that this is a geopolitical analyst’s column and not a gossip sheet, I’m betting on (b). Playing American domestic politics is now a baseline skill for any world leader. The fact that a king could do it so cleanly that the headline writers are still being cagey about what happened tells you something about the sophistication—and the brittleness—of how Washington operates.

North Korea’s Death Squads Are Official Policy Now

Then there’s the headline that should’ve stopped everyone in their tracks: Kim Jong Un praised troops for “self-blasting” to avoid capture by Ukraine.

“Self-blasting.” That’s the North Korean military euphemism for detonating grenades to kill yourself rather than be taken prisoner. And now we have confirmation that this isn’t soldiers panicking—it’s official policy. The regime is explicitly praising soldiers for committing suicide in combat.

From below of various flags on flagpoles located in green park in front of entrance to the UN headquarters in Geneva Photo by Mathias Reding / Pexels

This isn’t new as a practice. What’s new is that it’s happening with North Korean troops fighting in Ukraine, that it’s being openly praised by leadership, and that the US has documents confirming the pattern. North Korea sent soldiers to die in a European country’s war. Those soldiers are killing themselves rather than surrender. And the regime isn’t hiding it—it’s celebrating it.

I think this is going to be the story that historians point to when they ask “when did we know the system had completely broken down?” Because here’s the reality: North Korea is so isolated, so resource-starved, and so utterly dependent on China that it’s literally exporting its soldiers’ lives to Russia. And the soldiers themselves have been so thoroughly propagandized that suicide is preferable to capture. That’s not a country with a future—that’s a country in freefall trying to drag others down with it.

The Silence on Iran Is Deafening

Two months ago, something happened in Iran. A school was struck. It was deadly. And then—nothing. The Pentagon says it’s investigating. Former US officials say the silence is “highly unusual.”

There’s a word for “highly unusual” in diplomatic language: it means we don’t know how to respond, so we’re hoping this blows over. When a school gets hit and the Americans can’t even explain what happened, when the Iranians can’t celebrate it as an act of resistance, when nobody’s talking—that’s not a stable situation. That’s people holding their breath.

My genuine uncertainty here: I don’t know if this silence means the incident was so obviously justified that nobody dares defend it, or so obviously unjustified that everyone’s too afraid to prosecute it, or something else entirely. But I know silence this complete only happens when the truth is politically catastrophic for all parties involved.

Russians Are Starting to Notice the Censorship

Meanwhile in Russia, beauty influencers are openly questioning Putin’s moves to censor the internet. When your propaganda apparatus is so obvious that a beauty influencer breaks ranks, you’ve lost something fundamental.

The irony is that internet restrictions are supposed to silence opposition. Instead, they’re driving it out into the open. People see the censorship, figure out they’re being lied to, and start talking anyway. It’s the digital equivalent of a police state learning that crackdowns don’t actually make people more compliant—they just make them angrier and more determined to communicate around you.

From below of various flags on flagpoles located in green park in front of entrance to the UN headquarters in Geneva Photo by Mathias Reding / Pexels

What This Adds Up To

The UAE abandoning OPEC. A king playing Congress against the White House. North Korea celebrating suicide soldiers. Iran striking something and everyone pretending it didn’t happen. Russians openly defying censorship. These stories aren’t about individual policy failures. They’re about institutions losing their legitimacy at the same moment.

OPEC’s been functional because members believed coordination served their interests. That belief just died. Washington’s political system assumes visiting leaders won’t deliberately triangulate with opposition parties. That assumption’s damaged. North Korea’s survival depended on brutal control of information. That’s cracking. US-Iran relations are now so toxic that neither side can even acknowledge what happens. And Russia’s discovering that internet censorship creates silence that confirms people’s suspicions rather than eliminating them.

The through-line: every major institution is discovering that the tools that used to work—coordination, messaging, information control, diplomatic protocol—don’t work anymore. When your only leverage is force or total information dominance, and both are slipping away, you’re not in a strong negotiating position.

I think we’re heading into a period where regional powers act unilaterally more often, where authoritarian regimes become more visibly brittle rather than stronger, and where American diplomatic authority keeps eroding in small increments that add up. Not a collapse in 2025, but a steady dissolution.

What I’m Watching

  • UAE oil exports in Q2 2025: Watch the actual production numbers. If they exceed OPEC quotas by more than 10%, it signals other members are ready to jump. This is the canary in the coal mine for OPEC’s final years.

  • Russian internet traffic patterns: If VPN usage and alternate communication channels keep growing despite Kremlin crackdowns, it’s proof that propaganda works until it doesn’t. The tipping point is probably around 25-30% of urban young people actively circumventing censorship regularly.

  • Pentagon statements on Iran incidents: The next time something happens in or around Iran, watch whether the US breaks its silence faster. If it takes longer than this last incident, the precedent of “strategic ambiguity masquerading as investigation” is becoming doctrine.

  • North Korean soldier casualties in Ukraine by mid-year: If they exceed 5,000 confirmed losses, it means Pyongyang’s treating this as an expendable proxy war. That’s not a feature of a stable alliance—that’s desperation.