The Great Tech Reckoning: When Safety, Violence, and Profit Finally Collide

---

Sam Altman’s gate just got bombed. A 20-year-old from Texas threw a homemade explosive at it, and now he’s facing attempted murder charges plus federal felonies. The authorities found documents on him advocating violence against AI executives.

That sentence should make you sit down.

This isn’t some abstract debate anymore about whether AI is too powerful or whether tech billionaires deserve scrutiny. Someone actually tried to kill one because they thought the stakes were that high. And they’re not alone in thinking the stakes are high—they’re just alone in the homemade explosives department.

Meanwhile, back in the real world where most of us live, the tech industry is fracturing in real time. The same week we get bomb threats against AI executives, Booking.com reveals it’s been hacked and customers’ reservations are being hijacked. Google’s announcing it’ll penalize websites that trap people with broken back buttons. The UK government is telling tech bosses things “can’t go on like this” with online safety and is seriously considering banning under-16s from social media. And somehow—somehow—a sneaker company that just sold itself for $39 million is pivoting to become an AI startup.

None of these things should make sense together. But they do. They’re all symptoms of the same disease: an industry that’s grown so fast, so recklessly, and with so little oversight that it’s triggering every immune response society has.

Photo by Markus Winkler / Pexels

The Government Finally Stopped Asking Nicely

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer walked into a room with tech executives and didn’t soften the message with corporate pleasantries. “Things can’t go on like this with online safety,” he said. The government is consulting on whether to ban under-16s from social media entirely.

Think about that timeline. Fifteen years ago, banning kids from Facebook would’ve been absurd—the industry would’ve laughed it off. Now it’s a serious policy consideration in the world’s second-largest English-speaking economy. The UK isn’t fringe; it’s often a test kitchen for regulations that spread.

My read: this is happening. Not this year maybe, but by 2027? I’d bet money the UK either bans under-16s or requires ID verification that effectively does the same thing. And when the UK does it, the EU will follow within 18 months. The US will resist longest—because it always does—but even that has an expiration date.

What’s wild is that tech companies basically gave regulators no choice. If the industry had self-regulated even a little, if they’d taken even modest steps to protect minors from algorithmic addiction, Starmer wouldn’t be in that room making threats. Instead, the response to every safety concern has been studied silence or minimal changes buried in terms of service nobody reads.

The Security Theater Is Over

Booking.com got hacked. They changed something called “Pins” to protect customers, but they won’t say how many people were affected. Think about that sentence. A major travel platform—one that handles millions of reservations and payment details annually—had a breach significant enough to warrant a public warning, but they’re not disclosing scale.

This is what happens when you’ve apologized so many times that apologies become meaningless. Equifax in 2017. Facebook in 2018. Yahoo in 2013. Somehow we just… moved on. And the companies learned that if you wait long enough and refuse to be specific enough, people get distracted by the next headline.

Reservation hijacking is chilling. Someone else’s vacation, someone else’s hotel room, someone else’s money. It’s not abstract. It’s your summer trip to Barcelona getting stolen by someone in a basement in Minsk.

And here’s what really gets me: Google’s announcing it’ll punish sites that block the back button starting in June. That’s such a basic, elementary school level of “don’t be a dick” that the fact it needed a punishment system is its own kind of failure. Sites have been trapping users with broken navigation for years. Google knew. Everyone knew. Nothing happened until Google decided to weaponize search rankings.

Photo by nappy / Pexels

When Your Threat Model Includes Your Own Industry

Let’s talk about the elephant in the room shaped like a homemade bomb.

A 20-year-old had a list of AI leaders and documents advocating violence against them. He then allegedly tried to kill Sam Altman. This is what happens when you combine: (1) an industry moving fast enough to genuinely scare people, (2) a messaging landscape where every AI announcement is treated as either salvation or apocalypse, and (3) the existing infrastructure of extremism that finds everything online.

I don’t think this is about AI specifically. I think this is what happens when any industry moves fast enough that the public conversations can’t keep up, and you’ve got people who genuinely believe the stakes are existential. Some of those people will be right that the stakes are high. Some will just be broken people looking for a target.

But here’s the thing nobody wants to say out loud: the AI industry brought some of this on itself by overstating what their technology does and underselling what it doesn’t. When you call something “artificial general intelligence” and it’s still a very good autocomplete, you’ve got a messaging problem. When you talk about existential risk to humanity while your quarterly earnings call talks about scale, people notice the contradiction.

I’m genuinely uncertain whether this attack makes regulation more likely or less likely. It could go either way. Regulators might come down harder because they see radicalization. Or the industry might weaponize this attack to position themselves as victims under siege, using it to argue against safety regulations.

The Allbirds Moment

Here’s what broke my brain this week: a sneaker company that just sold itself for $39 million is now planning to become an AI startup. Specifically, they’re buying powerful computer chips and rebranding as “NewBird AI.”

This is what peak hype looks like. This is the moment you know the game’s changed completely. It’s not that Allbirds has some brilliant insight into AI. It’s that being an AI company is more valuable to investors right now than selling sustainable footwear to people who care about carbon offsets.

This is also what happens right before the music stops.

In 2000, you could stick “.com” on anything and raise $50 million. By 2001, those companies were evaporating. The actual value creation survived—Amazon, eBay, a few others—but most of the hype evaporated and we got a decade of better investing.

We’re not at peak AI hype yet. But we’re close. And Allbirds pivoting to AI chips is roughly the moment a historian will point to and say “that’s when we knew.”

Photo by Markus Spiske / Pexels

The Real Story Nobody’s Telling

The actual interesting thing happening is buried in one headline: “That Meeting You Hate May Keep A.I. From Stealing Your Job.”

As AI makes individual tasks easier—writing, coding, analysis, design—the human work that’s becoming more valuable is interpersonal. Cajoling. Arm-twisting. Reassuring. The stuff that involves actual human judgment about whether Bob should get a raise or whether the client really needs that feature.

This is going to split the economy in half. You’ll have AI-augmented workers handling the technical work faster and cheaper, and you’ll have people-managers commanding premiums because they understand other people. The middle is getting hollowed out in real time.

Meanwhile, Europe might actually win at quantum computing, which would be the first time a non-US tech sector genuinely led anything since the iPhone killed Europe’s phone manufacturers. That’s worth watching because if Europe pulls it off, it breaks the American monopoly on fundamental computing breakthroughs.

But that’s years away. The immediate story is messier: governments finally losing patience, security companies admitting they can’t keep up, extremists attacking billionaires, and a sneaker company becoming an AI venture. It’s a system in real-time transition.

What I’m Watching

• UK under-16 ban implementation timeline: Watch for formal legislation by Q4 2025. If it passes, EU follows within 18 months. This is the canary.

• Booking.com disclosure numbers: They’ll eventually have to say how many reservations were compromised. When they do, watch if other travel platforms admit similar breaches. The silence is coordinated.

• Google’s back-button punishment results: June onwards—do websites actually fix this, or just hide it better? Will tell you if Google punishment actually changes behavior or just spreads the violation across more sites.

• Next AI executive attack: This shouldn’t be morbid, but if there’s another incident, watch how the industry pivots narratives. That’s your tell for whether they’re actually changing or just better at PR.