TrendNew Politics. Diplomacy. Markets. Tech. What matters.
Diplomacy 6 min read

The World Is Coming Apart at the Seams—and Washington Barely Noticed

From Iran to Mexico to Lithuania, the headlines reveal a global order fracturing while the U.S. pivots between contradictions. Here's what's actually happening.

The World Is Coming Apart at the Seams—and Washington Barely Noticed

Defense Secretary Hegseth just said something remarkable that almost nobody caught: The clock on whether the president has to tell Congress about starting a war with Iran can be paused if there’s a ceasefire. Let that sink in. We’re talking about the War Powers Resolution, the 1973 law that basically says you’ve got 48 hours to notify Congress before military action, and another 30 days before you need approval. And apparently that timer isn’t as hard as we thought.

This isn’t a slip-up. This is the Trump administration flagging that they’re thinking operationally about an Iran conflict—not hypothetically, but in terms of the legal mechanics. They’re already running the scenario. And the fact that Hegseth’s framing it around ceasefires tells you something else: They know a full war with Iran gets expensive, fast, and messy. So they’re looking at off-ramps.

Which makes the second headline even worse.

Stylish flatlay featuring coffee, slice of cheesecake, and eyeglasses on paper. Photo by Boris Pavlikovsky / Pexels

The Food Crisis Nobody’s Talking About

Yara’s CEO just warned that fertilizer shortages tied to the Iran conflict could crater crop yields and spike food prices globally. We’re not talking about a modest uptick. We’re talking about billions of meals at risk. That’s the language of famine, carefully wrapped in corporate speak.

Here’s why this matters more than it seems: In 1973, the oil embargo after the Yom Kippur War sent shocks through the global economy for a year. That was oil. Fertilizer is worse because it’s invisible until it’s too late. Crops fail silently. Prices spike in the fall. By winter, you’ve got political instability in countries you weren’t even thinking about.

My read: If there’s a real conflict with Iran—not the pause-timer version, the actual version—we’re looking at food-price cascades in North Africa, South Asia, and the Middle East within six months. That’s the kind of thing that destabilizes governments. That’s the kind of thing that creates refugee flows. And the U.S. is apparently planning military action while treating this as a side effect, not a primary calculation.

Europe Is Waking Up. Too Slowly.

Lithuania just arrested nine people allegedly involved in Russian sabotage and murder plots. Read that again. Not spying. Murder plots. In a NATO country. In 2025.

Meanwhile, Turkish police arrested over 500 people at May Day rallies. France’s Prime Minister visited a bakery on Labour Day because apparently governing the country is less important than making a point about workers’ rights. And somewhere in the Balkans, Ratko Mladic—the guy convicted of genocide in the Bosnian war (1992-95)—is asking a judge to let him die at home instead of in prison.

These headlines seem disconnected. They’re not.

What’s happening is that Europe is fragmenting just as it needs to cohere. Russia’s running active operations in NATO territory. Turkey’s cracking down on dissent. France is distracted by internal politics. The Balkans’ wounds won’t close. And nobody’s doing anything that looks like coordinated response because everyone’s still pretending this is 2015.

Lithuania’s arrests should’ve been a Category-5 alarm in Brussels. Instead, it’s a footnote because Washington’s attention has swung so hard toward the Middle East that Europe basically got mothballed.

Close-up of a vintage typewriter with the word 'Diplomacy' on a paper sheet. Photo by Markus Winkler / Pexels

Lebanon, Mexico, and the Unraveling

In Lebanon, Hezbollah supporters are coming back to the group because Israel’s demolishing villages and the ceasefire’s falling apart. That’s not loyalty. That’s desperation. When your enemy destroys your home and your government can’t stop it, you embrace the only armed force that offers protection. That’s how the 1982-2000 Lebanese Civil War stayed hot.

In Mexico, a U.S. indictment of a state governor confirms what residents already knew: The government and cartels are basically the same thing now. The line has blurred. This isn’t corruption anymore—it’s structural rot.

These are symptoms of the same disease: State capacity collapsing and armed non-state actors filling the void. It’s happening in multiple regions simultaneously, and the U.S. foreign policy establishment hasn’t updated its playbook since 2001.

What Trump Actually Wants (And Why He’s Confused About It)

Trump says he’s “not satisfied” with Iran’s latest proposal for ending the war. He didn’t specify his objections. That’s either a negotiating tactic or a sign that he doesn’t have a clear endgame. Could be both.

Here’s my honest uncertainty: I can’t tell if the administration is planning a limited strike designed to pressure Iran into a deal, or if they’re genuinely considering a larger conflict and using the “pause timer” language as legal cover for something messier. The fertilizer warning from Yara suggests someone inside the administration understands the economic consequences. But the Iran rhetoric suggests they’re not actually deterred by those consequences.

This is the trap of having a president who thinks transactionally but acts impulsively. You get mixed signals because the decision-making process is actually mixed.

Saudi Arabia’s Silent Retreat

There’s one more headline worth noting: Saudi Arabia’s pulling back from expensive, high-profile ventures (like a golf league) due to financial concerns. The kingdom that spent like it was infinite is suddenly counting dollars.

This matters because Saudi Arabia’s been the ballast in the Middle East for a decade—stabilizing oil markets, funding proxy wars, keeping Arab states tethered to U.S. interests. If they’re tightening the belt, the region loses its main economic shock absorber. Which means the next crisis (Iran war? Israel-Hezbollah escalation? Yemen?) hits with no buffer.

From below of various flags on flagpoles located in green park in front of entrance to the UN headquarters in Geneva Photo by Mathias Reding / Pexels

What I Actually Think Is Happening

The global order isn’t just fracturing—it’s fracturing asymmetrically. The U.S. is trying to manage a potential Iran conflict while Russia tests NATO boundaries, while Europe’s distracted, while Mexico’s government collapses into cartel capture, while the Middle East’s ceasefires are sandpaper-thin, and while China’s probably just watching and taking notes.

We’re not in a new Cold War. We’re in something worse: a confused multipolar moment where nobody’s sure what the rules are anymore. And the U.S. keeps reaching for military tools (pause timers on war powers, drone strikes, sanctions) while the actual problems are economic (fertilizer, food prices, state capacity) and political (legitimacy, governance, the blurring of crime and government).

Trump’s “not satisfied” with Iran’s proposal because his satisfaction metric doesn’t exist yet. The administration is improvising, which is fine if you’re running a TV show. It’s catastrophic if you’re managing four or five simultaneous regional crises.

My prediction: We’ll see either a limited Iranian strike by Q3 2025 (designed to break the current stalemate and create space for a deal), or we’ll see the situation freeze because the food-price implications become too obvious and even this White House realizes you can’t fight Iran while your fertilizer supplies collapse. The third option—that we muddle through without escalation—feels least likely. Muddles require consensus, and consensus requires attention. We don’t have that anymore.

What I’m Watching

  • The fertilizer shortage timeline. If phosphate and potash supplies from Russia/Belarus tighten further and prices spike above $500/ton by June, that’s the real trigger for food inflation. Watch Yara’s quarterly earnings for more color on supply constraints.

  • NATO’s response to Lithuania’s arrests. If Brussels treats this as a Russian provocation requiring coordinated response, we’re still in a coherent NATO. If it gets buried as a national-level incident, NATO’s finished as a collective security body.

  • Trump’s next statement on Iran. Specifically: Does he articulate what “satisfaction” looks like in a deal, or does he keep the bar vague? Vague means he’s still deciding. Specific means he’s ready to move operationally.

  • Hezbollah recruitment trends. If support surges beyond the ceasefire-collapse ratios we’re seeing now, Israel’s going to feel pressure to act before Hezbollah rebuilds. That’s your escalation vector for summer 2025.